The Undesirability of Appeals in the Family Court
Recently, we have had a number of cases where parties have good prospects to appeal, but a decision has been
Call us on
Call us on
Big Money Cases – 50/50 split again confirmed by The Full Court of the Family Court
In a further recent decision in the case of Hoffman & Hoffman (30 May 2014); the Full Court of the Family Court has again confirmed that there is no binding rule or legitimate guideline concerning the Application of “special contributions” in big money cases. This case involved a 36 year marriage and the division of $10 million. There were four children of the relationship.
The Trial Judge held that the assets of $10 million should be divided equally between the Husband and Wife. The Husband (who represented himself) appealed to the Full Court, arguing that his special contribution in his business entitled him to a greater percentage split than 50%. The Full Court rejected that argument and upheld the Judge’s equal division of the $10 million.
This is yet another case of the Family Court in recent times (together with numerous articles) concentrating on the division of property in big money cases. There is no doubt, that these cases and articles written by learned authors indicate there is a current flavour in the Family Court to divide assets equally in large money cases.
However, it must be remembered that the High Court has stated that there is no presumption of equality and it is the writer’s view that some of the comments in the case of Hoffman and other cases are a veiled attempt to bring back “equality” or a “presumption of equality” under the guise of “relevant considerations” that the Court is entitled to take into account.
It is suggested, that under no circumstances can the Court put up as a relevant consideration or guideline any sort of notion of equality in relation to the task of identifying, assessing and evaluating each parties respective contributions.
It is the evidence of each party that guides the Court in the identification and assessment of relevant contributions. It is not some sort of general notion, with no foundation that long marriages should result in equality. Even if it is the case that the majority of cases in long marriages do result in a finding of equality, then that alone cannot have any impact upon the exercise of the discretion under Section 79 to make a just and equitable Property Settlement Order.
The Court’s role is to identify and assess the contributions made by each of the parties without any presumption of entitlement. The task is to make findings as to the nature, form, characteristics and duration of each and all of the contributions made by each of the parties, without adjectival qualification. Thereafter, the Court must undertake the difficult task in assessing how those respective contributions should be weighed.
In any property case it is very important for one to present their case with details in particularity about the various contributions they have made throughout the relationship. It is this effort and this alone that is important to the assessment and weighing of contributions in making a property determination.
The Trial Judge held that the assets of $10 million should be divided equally between the Husband and Wife. The Husband (who represented himself) appealed to the Full Court, arguing that his special contribution in his business entitled him to a greater percentage split than 50%. The Full Court rejected that argument and upheld the Judge’s equal division of the $10 million.
This is yet another case of the Family Court in recent times (together with numerous articles) concentrating on the division of property in big money cases. There is no doubt, that these cases and articles written by learned authors indicate there is a current flavour in the Family Court to divide assets equally in large money cases.
Recently, we have had a number of cases where parties have good prospects to appeal, but a decision has been
It is probably commonsense and goes without saying, but in so many matters we have clients present to us in
The Family Law Amendment Bill 2023 (Cth) which was passed on 19 October 2023 will result in significant changes to
© 2024 Hartley Family Law – All Rights Reserved | Privacy | Terms & Conditions
The Privacy Statement of the Company is incorporated into these Terms and Conditions. The Company respects the privacy of all its customers and business contacts. The Company is subject to the requirements of the National Privacy Principles which are contained in the Privacy Act.
1. How is personal information collected?
Your name, email address and phone number are collected on the contact form to allow the Company to contact you.
If you email or phone the Company directly, then the Company may record your personal details.
Your personal information may be used to:
a) Improve service to you, the customer
b) The Company may use personal information about you for marketing and research purposes. If you do not wish this to occur, please contact us and we will ensure this does not occur
c) Your personal information is not disclosed to any organisation outside of the Company.
2. Will personal information be given to anyone else?
The Company does not sell or provide your personal information to any other company.
3. Security of personal information
The Company employees are required, as a condition of their employment, to treat personal information held by the Company as confidential, and to maintain the confidentiality of that personal information.
The Company protects the personal information it collects in a secure database.
4. Access and correction
You can access your data at any time by contacting the Company directly.
You also have the right to ask us to correct information about you which is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date.
We ask you to contact the Company by email or phone using the Company contact details if you wish to access or correct any of your personal details.
5. Online privacy issues
To the extent that this Privacy Policy applies to online privacy issues, it is to be read as forming part of the terms of use for our website. When you deal with the Company whether online or otherwise, the Company takes its privacy obligations seriously.
6. Additional privacy information and how to contact the Company
The Company may change its Privacy Policy at any time.
For further information about privacy issues and the protection of privacy visit the Australian Federal Privacy Commissioner’s website at www.privacy.gov.au. If you feel that The Company is not complying with this Privacy Policy, or if you have other privacy concerns, please contact the company.
