The Undesirability of Appeals in the Family Court
Recently, we have had a number of cases where parties have good prospects to appeal, but a decision has been
Call us on
Call us on
The recent Private Members Bills introduced by Federal Independent Member for Indi, Catherine McGowin to stop alleged or proven perpetrators of family violence directly cross-examining their victims should be supported and applauded.
In my view, there is rarely any good that comes from spouses cross-examining their former spouse at a trial in the Family Court.
Unrepresented litigants don’t have legal training or legal knowledge and have no idea about how to cross-examine appropriately and correctly. They often use the opportunity to cross-examine as a stage to showcase emotions including anger.
In my view, it is inappropriate in all circumstances for a spouse to cross-examine another spouse. What good can come of it? If one doesn’t know the purpose or understand the legal complexities of cross-examination then how can one use it for any benefit? The argument is even more compelling where there is alleged or actual violence that has occurred. The fact that we have a system that allows the perpetrator of violence to inflict more violence by verbal harassment when questioning an ex-spouse is deplorable.
Judges can only do so much in restricting cross-examination but often there are things such as the tone of the voice, eye contract, staring and other non-verbal forms of intimidation that can have a significant impact on a victim of violence.
In the majority of cases that come before the Family Court, self-represented litigants cross-examining their former spouse can only do harm and not good to their own case and prospects. The taking of evidence in writing (by affidavits) and the receipt of other expert evidence in writing (by affidavit) and allowing each party to make submissions about their case should be sufficient in majority of cases where self-represented litigants come before the Court.
In financial matters, the government should consider amending the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) so as to provide Judges with the power to Order private Arbitration on the papers for small and non-complex financial matters that are clogging up the system. A lot of these mattes also include self-represented litigants who because of the small size of the matrimonial estate can’t afford lawyers. The power to Order private Arbitration allows the hearing to take place quickly and cheaply and Orders can be made directing the type of arbitration that can take place. This can include Orders restricting any cross-examination of the parties and have the arbitration determined on the papers by an experienced arbitrator.
There are many aspects of our legal system that continue to require improvement and the Private Members Bill introduced by Ms McGowin should be supported.
Unrepresented litigants don’t have legal training or legal knowledge and have no idea about how to cross-examine appropriately and correctly. They often use the opportunity to cross-examine as a stage to showcase emotions including anger.
Recently, we have had a number of cases where parties have good prospects to appeal, but a decision has been
It is probably commonsense and goes without saying, but in so many matters we have clients present to us in
The Family Law Amendment Bill 2023 (Cth) which was passed on 19 October 2023 will result in significant changes to
© 2024 Hartley Family Law – All Rights Reserved | Privacy | Terms & Conditions
The Privacy Statement of the Company is incorporated into these Terms and Conditions. The Company respects the privacy of all its customers and business contacts. The Company is subject to the requirements of the National Privacy Principles which are contained in the Privacy Act.
1. How is personal information collected?
Your name, email address and phone number are collected on the contact form to allow the Company to contact you.
If you email or phone the Company directly, then the Company may record your personal details.
Your personal information may be used to:
a) Improve service to you, the customer
b) The Company may use personal information about you for marketing and research purposes. If you do not wish this to occur, please contact us and we will ensure this does not occur
c) Your personal information is not disclosed to any organisation outside of the Company.
2. Will personal information be given to anyone else?
The Company does not sell or provide your personal information to any other company.
3. Security of personal information
The Company employees are required, as a condition of their employment, to treat personal information held by the Company as confidential, and to maintain the confidentiality of that personal information.
The Company protects the personal information it collects in a secure database.
4. Access and correction
You can access your data at any time by contacting the Company directly.
You also have the right to ask us to correct information about you which is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date.
We ask you to contact the Company by email or phone using the Company contact details if you wish to access or correct any of your personal details.
5. Online privacy issues
To the extent that this Privacy Policy applies to online privacy issues, it is to be read as forming part of the terms of use for our website. When you deal with the Company whether online or otherwise, the Company takes its privacy obligations seriously.
6. Additional privacy information and how to contact the Company
The Company may change its Privacy Policy at any time.
For further information about privacy issues and the protection of privacy visit the Australian Federal Privacy Commissioner’s website at www.privacy.gov.au. If you feel that The Company is not complying with this Privacy Policy, or if you have other privacy concerns, please contact the company.
