Arbitration as an Alternative in Family Law
Recently, we have had a number of cases where parties have good prospects to appeal, but a decision has been
Call us on
Call us on
In Family Court property settlement disputes, a spouse’s interest in a Superannuation Fund must always be identified and valued.
However, there is no necessity for that interest to be split and there are different ways in which a Court can treat a party’s interest in a superannuation fund.
In some situations the Court may find that it is not just and equitable to make any alteration of any party’s interest in property or superannuation. In other words, no adjustments are made to any existing legal or equitable interest that either party has in property. This can sometimes occur because of the principles laid down in the High Court decision in Stanford’s Case.
In other situations, typically long marriages where assets have been intermingled and each party has made substantial contributions, the contributions to each party’s superannuation interests are considered as part of the overall contribution analysis. This may or may not result in the Court making a Splitting Order to split a part of one party’s superannuation interests to the other.
In other cases, contributions to superannuation are assessed separately to contributions to other assets. This typically occurs in matters where “an asset by asset” approach is taken to the assessment of contributions. In those cases once again, there may or may not be a superannuation split, depending upon the individual assessment of contributions by both parties to their respective superannuation funds.
Importantly, before assessing whether a superannuation split is necessary or not, it is essential to identify the nature and type of a party’s superannuation interest. Once that is done, one can examine the effect of any proposed Orders and consequences of any superannuation split that may or may not be in the client’s best interest.
In some situations the Court may find that it is not just and equitable to make any alteration of any party’s interest in property or superannuation. In other words, no adjustments are made to any existing legal or equitable interest that either party has in property. This can sometimes occur because of the principles laid down in the High Court decision in Stanford’s Case.
In other situations, typically long marriages where assets have been intermingled and each party has made substantial contributions, the contributions to each party’s superannuation interests are considered as part of the overall contribution analysis. This may or may not result in the Court making a Splitting Order to split a part of one party’s superannuation interests to the other.
Recently, we have had a number of cases where parties have good prospects to appeal, but a decision has been
Recently, we have had a number of cases where parties have good prospects to appeal, but a decision has been
Recently, we have had a number of cases where parties have good prospects to appeal, but a decision has been
© 2024 Hartley Family Law – All Rights Reserved | Privacy | Terms & Conditions
The Privacy Statement of the Company is incorporated into these Terms and Conditions. The Company respects the privacy of all its customers and business contacts. The Company is subject to the requirements of the National Privacy Principles which are contained in the Privacy Act.
1. How is personal information collected?
Your name, email address and phone number are collected on the contact form to allow the Company to contact you.
If you email or phone the Company directly, then the Company may record your personal details.
Your personal information may be used to:
a) Improve service to you, the customer
b) The Company may use personal information about you for marketing and research purposes. If you do not wish this to occur, please contact us and we will ensure this does not occur
c) Your personal information is not disclosed to any organisation outside of the Company.
2. Will personal information be given to anyone else?
The Company does not sell or provide your personal information to any other company.
3. Security of personal information
The Company employees are required, as a condition of their employment, to treat personal information held by the Company as confidential, and to maintain the confidentiality of that personal information.
The Company protects the personal information it collects in a secure database.
4. Access and correction
You can access your data at any time by contacting the Company directly.
You also have the right to ask us to correct information about you which is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date.
We ask you to contact the Company by email or phone using the Company contact details if you wish to access or correct any of your personal details.
5. Online privacy issues
To the extent that this Privacy Policy applies to online privacy issues, it is to be read as forming part of the terms of use for our website. When you deal with the Company whether online or otherwise, the Company takes its privacy obligations seriously.
6. Additional privacy information and how to contact the Company
The Company may change its Privacy Policy at any time.
For further information about privacy issues and the protection of privacy visit the Australian Federal Privacy Commissioner’s website at www.privacy.gov.au. If you feel that The Company is not complying with this Privacy Policy, or if you have other privacy concerns, please contact the company.
